Schelling Goodness, and Shared Morality as a Goal
Also available in markdown at theMultiplicity.ai/blog/schelling-goodness. This post explores a notion I'll call Schelling goodness. Claims of Schelling goodness are not first-order moral verdicts like "X is good" or "X is bad." They are claims about a class of hypothetical coordination games in the sense of Thomas
✦ Editorial Summary
This editorial discusses the concept of "Schelling goodness," which refers to hypothetical coordination games that facilitate shared moral understanding. Claims of Schelling goodness are not direct moral judgments but rather assessments of how individuals can coordinate and agree on moral principles. This concept highlights the importance of shared morality in achieving collective goals.
T1 SOURCE This article comes from a Tier 1 publication — a peer-reviewed journal, major wire service, or established research institution.
WOKHEI The excerpt above is sourced from the original publication. WokHei does not add editorial bias. Click the link below to read the full article at the source.
Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in for a verified badge and your comments appear instantly. Or post anonymously — anonymous comments are held briefly for moderation.
WokHei Digest
Workflow insights, delivered
Curated tips, tools, and tutorials for builders — twice a month, no spam.